Monday, 6 April 2009
Ouch! Out of SRS again.
Just dumped my SRS US Real Estate short ETF, following the post-G20 rises, at $39.07 (about £26.33). That's a sterling loss of about 30% - ouch indeed.
Labels:
IYR,
SRS,
Ultrashort Real Estate
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
The Long and the Short of it
So, have we hit the bottom yet? I don't really know, alhough I doubt it. The broad equity gains that we've seen over the past few weeks look more like a bear market rally to me, than anythng bigger. But, I do feel justified in increasing my equity exposure.
If you will recall, I bought into Singapore last year, on the basis of the financial soundness, good dividend yield and likely future bull market participation. Further to the "Asia as the future" theme, I have today bought into the schroder Oriental Income investment trust (SOI.LSE), at 75p. SOI invests in a broad range of Asian equities, and offers a 7%+ dividend yield, as well as a discount to NAV of over 9%. As with EWS, I intend to hold this one through the current crisis and beyond, while soaking up the divi's along the way.
But, as way of a counter-weight, I've also gone short again, via the Proshares Ultrashort US Real Estate ETF (SRS.NYSE), buying at $54.66 (about £38). I've traded this one successfully before, and I'm using my short-term moving-average methods again (this is not a buy and hold investment).
Monday, 30 March 2009
Bargain Issue Oil Junior - IPL
Right, here's one I've been looking at for a while, but which recently hit my "limit buy" order - Indago Petroleum (IPL.LSE), a junior oil and gas explorer listed on AIM. They currently have an interest in three exploration wells in Oman - see their website for details.
What's interesting about IPL? Well, for a start, you must have noticed how the oil price has been absolutely slaughtered by the post-Lehman crash, taking the energy juniors with it. It seems likely to me that this correction went too far, and (like any hard asset) oil should at least recover against increasingly debased currencies such as sterling or the US dollar. There's also the whole Peak Oil argument, which I find quite convincing, but this is very much strategic background.
To be more specific, IPL is an oil explorer which hasn't found any oil (yet). In fact, looking at their last interim report, what they have encountered is a series of problems, including a blow-out at their Al Jariya well in February 2008.
So, what's worth buying about this company? I refer you to their announcement of 23rd February 2009, which indicates that a settlement has been reached with their insurers regarding compensation for the above blow-out, viz.:
Once the Company has received its share of the Settlement, it is projected to have cash balances in the region of $38 million. It is anticipated that all the Settlement monies will have been received by the end of March 2009.
Source: Investegate.co.uk
Now, this is where it gets interesting. If you deduct all of their liabilities from the above cash figure (about $10M, in the last interim report), that leaves net cash of $28M, or around£19.23M in sterling. Divided by the 53.36M shares in issue, and you have a net cash per share figure of around 36p.
Those of you familiar with Benjamin Graham's classic The Intelligent Investor will see where I am coming from. Graham's definition of a "bargain issue" was a company trading at a significant discount to its net current asset figure. I managed to pick up some IPL the other day at 25p; they're 28p now as I type, which is still a 22% discount to cash.
Is IPL a sure thing? Of course not - all that cash could easily be frittered away on further failed exploration effort. But, oil and gas exploration is essentially a throw of the dice; just because IPL have been unlucky up until now, does not mean their next effort will also draw a blank. And, generally rising oil and gas prices would also help the share price.
When all is said and done, though, this is just a small speculation, not something to bet the farm on.
Labels:
bargain issue,
Ben Graham,
Indago Petroleum,
IPL,
oil
Sunday, 29 March 2009
Don't fight the Fed
Firstly, further apologies for the lightness of blogging this month - there's just been too much Real Life getting in the way.
If you've been following my methods, you'll be unsurpised to learn that I have once more exited The Big Trade , following the Fed's announcement to quantitatively ease their way up the yield curve. I got out at $44.77 (£31.01), about a 9% sterling loss, which is unwelcome but not catastrophic.
Is this still a trade worth watching? The fundamentals argue in favour, and, indeed, long-dated T-bonds have declined markedly since December (TLT, the 20+ T-Bond ETF, was over $122 in December, versus only $104 on Friday). I have just found it impossible (so far) to make worthwhile profits from the decline through the TBT Ultrashort vehicle. Maybe that is just bad luck (similar trades using Ultrashort ETF's have worked well, notably the SRS real estate short).
At any event, I'm out for now, although I certainly won't be buying T-bonds any time soon.
If you've been following my methods, you'll be unsurpised to learn that I have once more exited The Big Trade , following the Fed's announcement to quantitatively ease their way up the yield curve. I got out at $44.77 (£31.01), about a 9% sterling loss, which is unwelcome but not catastrophic.
Is this still a trade worth watching? The fundamentals argue in favour, and, indeed, long-dated T-bonds have declined markedly since December (TLT, the 20+ T-Bond ETF, was over $122 in December, versus only $104 on Friday). I have just found it impossible (so far) to make worthwhile profits from the decline through the TBT Ultrashort vehicle. Maybe that is just bad luck (similar trades using Ultrashort ETF's have worked well, notably the SRS real estate short).
At any event, I'm out for now, although I certainly won't be buying T-bonds any time soon.
Labels:
TBT,
TLT,
Ultrashort 20 plus T-Bond
Thursday, 5 March 2009
Canadian Bonds and a Short Goodbye
Alright, he's really Australian, but it's the closest you'll get (rumours that William Shatner was originally slated to replace Sean are completely unfounded)A bit more trading today. Firstly, and with some reluctance, I said goodbye to my EFA short, the Proshares Short MSCI EAFE ETF (EFZ). This was, if you recall, a play on collapsing European shares, as a result of the east European economic implosion.
I still think this is on the cards, but having been very oversold for a couple of days (14-day RSI below 14), I think that the EFA index could rally quite a bit. So, I have sold EFZ at $109.47 (£77.55), which is about a 10% profit. Nothing too exciting, but at least it's in the right direction.
I have also replaced my Yen holdings with an ETF which holds short-dated Canadian government bonds - the Claymore 1-5 year Laddered Government Bond ETF, which trades in Toronto under the symbol CLF.TO (see here for details). I bought a big stack at C$21.09 (about £11.65).
CLF is mainly a play on the Canadian dollar, which I suspect could do well if commodities such as oil manage to recover at all. At the same time, CLF is a much less risky proposition than a commodity ETF or share, as it should also benefit from renewed deflationary pressure. That's my theory, anyway, although I'm not alone.
Labels:
Canadian dollar,
Claymore ETF,
CLF,
EFA,
EFZ,
Short MSCI EAFE
Quick updates - FXY & TBT
Too much real life recently for blogging, but just a quick update to note a couple of trades:
- I have dumped my CurrencyShares Japanese Yen ETF (FXY) at $102.15 (about £72.66) - a loss of about 7%. I just couldn't stay enthused about the Yen's prospects.
- The Big Trade's back on! I have bought TBT again at $47.26 / £2.92.
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
An expensive education - NCV & ILH
If I may quote myself from a few weeks ago regarding my junk bond plays (NCV and ILH): "I'll bail out if I see one of the two monsters winning - another deflationary collapse, or serious inflation".
Well, I think that the Dow hitting its lowest close since May 1997, and the very real likelihood of sovereign default in Eastern Europe, qualifies as a renewed deflationary collapse. So, regretfully, I have dumped my junk bond holdings - NCV at $3.98/£2.74 (a 32% sterling loss) and ILH at 30.5p (a lesser loss of about 5%).
Obviously, I got this call spectacularly wrong, but such is the nature of a hedged portfolio, which is what the CCI portfolio tries to be.
Labels:
ILH,
junk bonds,
NCV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



